Lawsuit’s a loser

MySpace Lawsuits Called Losers:

It seems I’m not the only one who thinks the latest lawsuit against MySpace is without merit. So does law professor Eric Goldman.

First, Goldman says, it’s a stretch under the legal definition of causation to assert that MySpace contributed to a crime that didn’t occur on its premises.

Second, he said, the law “routinely insulate[s] Web sites for liability for torts committed outside their network.” Thus, he points out, AOL was not held liable for child porn generated elsewhere and distributed through its network.

Why bother with the lawsuit then? Goldman speculates, “Given the obviously futile nature of this lawsuit, this lawsuit may be more about publicity than about seeking justice.”

As Goldman points out, the risk of high-profile lawsuits like this is that they may encourage ill-conceived, knee-jerk legislation. The problem is even the most extreme restrictions seem reasonable if the purpose is “protecting kids.” How many politicians, for example, would have the courage to oppose something like “The Boil Pedophiles Alive Act of 2007”? Not many, I suspect.

Let’s hope this lawsuit never goes any further.

Comments

2 responses to “Lawsuit’s a loser”

  1. Jessica Avatar
    Jessica

    Awww…just proof of why PARENTS should be guardians of our children, not the internet. The parents pay the bill for the internet in the house and for the computer the child uses. If a parent is held negligent for not taking their kid to school, they should be held negligent for allowing their child to communicate with strangers.

  2. David Avatar
    David

    Agreed. 100%

Leave a Reply to Jessica Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *