Tag: bludgeoning

  • More testimony in Henderson trial

    (Again this was written up yesterday but I took last night off.)

    Henderson ‘normal’ after deaths:

    More testimony in the trial of Richard Henderson Jr. This time let’s hear from his grandfather.

    Loyal Stringer told jurors their grandson said he was taking a girlfriend home. He testified he appeared “normal,” but the girlfriend appeared scared and had “little color in her face.”

    Henderson, before he drove off, told his grandparents not to go to the house because his parents were fighting “real bad.”

    Again that doesn’t sound like an insane person to me.

    Now some testimony from his friends…

    More testimony from Nicole J. Russell and Zach Anderson – two friends of Henderson Jr. – indicated they had previously seen Henderson take Xanex and smoke marijuana.

    Russell also said she had seen him the day after the killings and that he told her he was going to Mexico.

    The day before and after the killings, Anderson testified, he saw Henderson Jr. at a friend’s house. Henderson, he said, appeared normal and “in touch with reality.”

    If he appeared normal after slaughtering his entire family he must be one heartless S.O.B.

    So far it doesn’t look like the insanity defense is going really well.

  • Henderson trial starts

    Sides come out firing on Day One of Henderson trial:

    The trial of Richard Henderson Jr. opened yesterday. Henderson is accused of killing his entire family on Thanksgiving 2005.

    The defense, of course, is pursuing an insanity defense…

    But Franklin Roberts, one of Henderson’s court-appointed attorneys, told the jury a different story as he outlined his client’s defense. He contended the slayings in the family’s Myakka City mobile home were a tragedy brought on by Henderson Jr.’s severe mental illness.

    “The horrible act of someone who was insane at the time it was committed,” Roberts said of Henderson, charged with four counts of first-degree murder in the deaths of his father, Richard Sr.; mother, Jeaneane; grandmother, June; and younger brother, Jacob.

    As Henderson occasionally jotted notes, Roberts described him as a man with a troubled youth full of drug abuse, suicide attempts and self-mutilation.

    “Early in life, something was wrong,” Roberts said. “He had trouble keeping up in school . . . was disruptive in class. He is not someone who simply at one moment in time – suddenly exploded.”

    Doctors will take the stand, Roberts said, and testify Henderson was insane when he killed his family.

    But just as the prosecution asked how can Henderson be insane when he did this?

    Henderson, while playing video games with his 11-year-old brother, took a metal pipe, struck him on the head and pushed the boy out a window. Then, in separate rooms, Henderson attacked his 82-year-old grandmother, his father, 48, and his mother, 42, killing each with “lethal amount of force” to their heads.

    Sandy Stringer, Henderson’s other grandmother, called the home for her daughter, Jeaneane, on the night of the killings.

    But Henderson Jr. answered instead.

    Lying, he said that his mom was in the shower and would soon go to bed.

    The day after the killings, Iten said, Henderson took his parents’ van, picked up his girlfriend and her friend and the three spent the next two nights in an Ellenton hotel. There, he told his girlfriend that he had killed people. But he lied about who, Iten said. He said he had killed his ex-wife, Brittany Wilde, and then killed his grandmother after she walked in on the attack.

    He also later told friends he planned to head for Mexico, Iten said.

    If he was insane he would have told his girlfriend that he killed Snap, Crackle, and Pop and was running away to Crunchland. (If he did kill Snap, Crackle, and Pop wouldn’t that make him a cereal killer?)

    Henderson isn’t insane he’s just a cold-blooded killer.

  • Henderson wants change of venue

    Accused killer Henderson wants trial moved:

    The defense attorneys for Richard Henderson Jr. are trying to get the trial moved. Henderson bludgeoned his family to death Thanksgiving Day 2005 with a lead pipe.

    So defense attorneys Carolyn Schlemmer and Franklin Roberts have requested a change of venue for their client’s murder trial, set for next month.

    “I don’t feel it can be held here,” Schlemmer said Wednesday. “There has been too much publicity, too much connecting him to other cases and there is just no way we’d get a fair trial.”

    And Henderson himself has this little gem…

    “Extensive publicity has caused me hardship at the jail,” states an affidavit signed by Henderson last month. “The pretrial publicity has portrayed me as guilty to four counts of murder in the first degree.”

    A lot of the pre-trial publicity Henderson brought upon himself. Let’s not forget the letter that he sent to the Bradenton Herald. If you act like a murderous psychopath people may think you are.

    Let’s also not forget that he basically confessed to the crime but as expected the defense attorneys are trying to get that thrown out.

    In another motion filed Wednesday, Schlemmer said she wants Henderson’s statements to police suppressed and any evidence seized from him on Nov. 27, 2005, to be ruled inadmissible at trial.

    She says the evidence was illegally obtained as a result of an unlawful stop by Deputy Rodney Norris, with the Manatee County Sheriff’s Office.

    Norris, with his gun drawn, stopped Henderson as a possible suspect in the 4900 block of U.S. 301, according to the motion.

    Henderson initially told deputies his name was Jason. But he fit the description of the suspect in the slayings, and Norris arrested him.

    Norris found a glass pipe with marijuana residue in his left pocket, according to sheriff’s reports.

    Norris did not have a “founded suspicion” that Henderson had committed, was committing or was about to commit a violation of the law, according to the motion.

    What are the police supposed to do?

    Officer: Dispatch, we have a male fitting the description of a fugitive wanted for murder. Moving in to apprehend.

    Dispatch: Negative, wait for subject to do something “suspicious”.

    “Founded suspicion” my ass. What if police didn’t approach him and he killed somebody else? How well do you think that would have gone over with the public?

    A hearing for these ridiculous requests will be held on June 22nd.

  • Henderson Hopes for Hell

    Henderson hopes for death in letter:

    Richard Henderson Jr. is currently awaiting trial in Florida for bludgeoning his family to death on Thanksgiving Day 2005. Before that, he was in trouble for plotting to shoot up his school. He wrote the following letter to the Bradenton Herald…

    As for my case im happy to be closing in on the day i’ll know where my future lies. As for if I get the Death instead of life or possibly something else, Great, ill be happy. Id rather get Death then life so I don’t have to witness the schemes and abuse of Authority the State lives by. As for my so called Family, let me make this clear. I don’t give a damn what they think, they say they know me how can that be if I only saw them 7 times in my life, to hell with them, I want them to know if I do get the death penality I will haunt their dreams and forever taint the blood of our Family. The way I see it, it’s their fault, if someone could of got me help instead of gossiping maybe my family be alive, maybe I could of had a normal life,” he wrote. “But no, everyone wants to talk, to judge. Find a way to live my life, to do all I did, to fell all my pain then you can judge me. How many Virginia tech massacers, how many columbines, how many Ross’s, Davis’s, Henderson’s is it gonna take to show kid’s are not being properly raised/helped/counsaled like they need to be. The Guilt of the crimes lies in the so called innocent, we were just the puppets that released the evil society breeds. You want Justice, you want us to feel pain, our whole lives have been pain. Me being in here with no friends, no family, just guilt, that’s pain. Just keep gossiping, keep . . . cause pain is coming to a place called home. Let’s see how you handle it.

    First off if he wants death I say no problem. To me, it sounds like he’s trying to pull a Susan Smith. She begged for a death sentence and they gave her a life sentence. Personally, I don’t think Henderson wants any part of a death sentence. I think he’s bluffing and I hope the jury calls him on that bluff.

    Secondly, I love how Henderson pulls the old “blame society” crap. Society didn’t cause him to kill his family. Only Henderson caused that. No one in this society is owed anything. The only thing that I hope is owed to Henderson is a quick trial and a death sentence.

  • Dyleski gets life

    Dyleski gets life

    Dyleski gets life in prison without parole:

    Scott Dyleski has been sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole in the murder of Pam Vitale.

    Some words from the sentencing judge…

    “The one time I saw you show any emotion is during autopsy photos,” Contra Costa Superior Court Judge Barbara Zuniga told the Dyleski as she sentenced the teenager.

    “I saw you, sir, lean forward and your mouth fell open. And that’s the position you remained in. You were absolutely fascinated by your handwork. You don’t deserve to live among decent people.”

    The pleas for leniency by Dyleski’s lawyer obviously fell on deaf ears, and took the brutal way Pam Vitale was killed into consideration rather than Dyleski’s youth and “troubled upbringing”.

    Personal responsibility wins a rare victory.

  • Dyleski lawyer asks for leniency

    Dyleski lawyer asks for leniency

    Defense asks for leniency for Dyleski:

    Citing his unstable childhood, the attorney for convicted murderer Scott Dyleski has asked a judge to consider handing down the lightest possible sentence for killing his neighbor, Pamela Vitale.

    Dyleski deserves a sentence of 25 years to life in prison, which would give him the opportunity for parole, deputy public defender Ellen Leonida wrote in her sentencing memo to Superior Court Judge Barbara Zuniga.

    “All he is asking for is an opportunity to demonstrate — many, many years from now — that he can change,” Leonida wrote.

    He showed no leniency on Pam Vitale, so the state of California should not show him any.

  • Dyleski found guilty

    Dyleski found guilty

    Dyleski weeps as jury finds him guilty:

    MARTINEZ – Scott Dyleski put a hand over his eyes, leaned over and wept Monday afternoon as he heard a jury’s verdict finding him guilty of first-degree murder and a special circumstance that will send him to prison for the rest of his life.

    The jury deliberated about 18 hours before deciding Dyleski, 17, murdered 52-year-old Pamela Vitale on Oct. 15, 2005.

    With the conviction on the special-circumstance count of murder in the commission of a burglary, Dyleski will be sentenced to state prison without possibility of parole. He was 16 when he killed Vitale.

    The prosecutor said at trial Dyleski killed Vitale in connection with a scheme to purchase marijuana-growing equipment with stolen credit cards.

    Prosecutor Harold Jewett argued that Dyleski may have killed Vitale mistakenly believing that she was another neighbor. He was angry at the other neighbor for thwarting his plan to purchase the equipment and for running over his dog a month earlier.

    However, jurors did not believe that theory, said 55-year-old Concord resident Peter DeCristofaro, the single juror willing to speak with reporters.

    “That didn’t even come up,” he said. “We didn’t buy that.”

    He said all but one juror was certain from the first day of deliberations about guilt, but it took three days to decide that it was premeditated murder.

    “As far as guilt, we got that nailed down pretty quick,” he said.

    Sentencing is set for Sept. 26.

  • Dyleski jury deliberates

    Dyleski jury deliberates

    Dyleski Jurors Begin New Week Of Deliberations:

    The jury in the trial of Scott Dyleski has been deliberating, and on Friday had requested the following items…

    E-mail correspondence between Dyleski and his friend who is accused of taking part in a marijuana growing scheme

    The emergency contact list of the Hunsaker Canyon Road residents

    Aerial photos of the Hunsaker Canyon neighborhood, where Vitale lived

    Photo of mansion Daniel Horowitz and Vitale were building at the time of her death

    Photos of the content of Dyleski’s red backpack. The items in the backpack were eventually turned over to police by Dyleksi’s mother.

    Hernandez said the jury started deliberations ten minutes ahead of schedule on Friday. Hernandez said by midday, jurors requested even more items submitted into evidence. They included a photo of Scott Dyleski after his arrest, as well as photos from his room. They also asked to see the tape lift of shoe print and a photo of shoe print on a plastic lid.

    As soon as I hear anything about a verdict, I will let you know.

  • Closing statements in Dyleski trial

    Closing statements in Dyleski trial

    Prosecutor: Dyleski misidentified Vitale:

    Scott Dyleski killed Pamela Vitale mistakenly thinking she was another neighbor who had accidentally killed his dog and foiled his plan to buy marijuana-growing equipment, a prosecutor said Tuesday in closing arguments at Dyleski’s trial.

    “It doesn’t make sense any other way,” Harold Jewett said.

    In her closing, Dyleski’s defense attorney referred to her client a half dozen times as “a 17-year-old boy” and a kind teenager, and said somebody else killed Pamela Vitale.

    Jewett portrayed Dyleski as dismal and depressed, blaming the defendant, but also his parents and teachers for allowing a killer to brew.

    “You left me to die in the dark streets with nothing more than broken dreams. … You raised me to hate, and hate I will, because now I live, I live for the kill,” Jewett read from a school poem Dyleski wrote.

    The prosecutor added that influential people in Dyleski’s life did not intervene.

    “That’s really cool,” Jewett read from comments written by a teacher about the poem.

    Deputy public defender Ellen Leonida reminded the jury how her client’s friends testified he was a non-violent vegan who cared about people.

    I don’t know if it’s the way the media is reporting it, but this trial sounds like a complete clusterfuck.

    I won’t be surprised, no matter what verdict is announced.

  • Dyleski defense rests

    Dyleski defense rests

    SCOTT DYLESKI’S ATTORNEY RESTS HER CASE:

    So let me get this straight. Dyleski’s public defender, Ellen Leonida, rested her case after only hearing testimony from character witnesses?

    During her opening statement, Leonida argued that Dyleski couldn’t have killed Vitale because a witness saw him at home at the time of the murder. Dyleski lived a short walk down the hill on Hunsaker Canyon Road from where Vitale and Horowitz lived. That witness testified earlier in the trial that he was no longer sure what time he saw Dyleski that morning.

    Although the prosecution presented extensive DNA evidence connecting Dyleski to the crime, Leonida did not call any of her own expert witnesses to rebut the DNA evidence.

    Closing arguments are scheduled to begin Tuesday morning in Judge Barbara Zuniga’s courtroom in Martinez.

    Not much of a lawyer, or did she know she didn’t have much to work with?