Category: Crime

  • Fry cook pleads guilty

    Boy, 15, charged in plot to attack LI high school pleads guilty:

    The unnamed 15-year-old accused in the plot to attack Connetquot High School and a Long Island McDonald’s has pleaded guilty to charges against him.

    The 15-year-old boy entered the plea in Family Court in Central Islip on Tuesday. He was originally charged with fifth-degree conspiracy, a misdemeanor, but his plea was for a less serious charge.

    The 15-year-old could face prison, probation or hospitalization when he is sentenced on Aug. 21. He also could be permanently removed from his home or placed in a residential treatment center or in foster care.

    The next court date for his 17-year-old cohort Michael McDonough is August 6th.

  • Hainstock’s videotaped statement

    Wis. Teen Told Police He ‘Freaked Out’:

    The videotaped statement that Eric Hainstock gave to investigators was shown to the jury yesterday.

    The video, filmed just hours after the Sept. 29 shooting, shows Hainstock slouched in a Sauk County Sheriff’s Department interview room with Klang’s blood on his clothes. He tells detectives that he complained to Klang for three years about kids teasing him and calling him a “fag,” but that Klang did nothing to stop them.

    That morning after his parents left their home, he says in the video, he “was still ticked off” at various students and the principal.

    According to the criminal complaint, Hainstock, then a 15-year-old freshman, went to school outside Cazenovia, about 65 miles northwest of Madison, with a shotgun and a revolver.

    A janitor tore the shotgun away, and Hainstock pulled out the revolver, cocked it and got ready to fire, he tells detectives in the video.

    Hainstock was well-trained in firearms. You don’t cock the hammer on a gun unless you have full intentions of using it.

    He says Klang came toward him and asked him, ‘What’s going on?’”

    “I’m like, ‘I’m sick of you guys,’” he says in the interview.

    He ordered Klang into an office, and as they turned to walk there, Klang jumped him, Hainstock says. He stuck his pistol under Klang’s left armpit and fired three times, he says. Klang later died.

    “I just freaked out,” Hainstock says.

    Yet multiple witnesses have testified that they heard Hainstock say he was there to kill someone. To me cocking the gun definitely shows intent. If he wanted to scare someone he could have just pointed an empty gun at them. But no Hainstock went in there with two different loaded weapons with multiple rounds available for reloading. He was planning on a massacre. He didn’t freak out. He probably realized that when John Klang went for his gun that it was probably the only chance he was going to get for revenge. John Klang probably saved a lot of lives that fateful day.

  • More testimony against Hainstock

    Student: ‘We don’t need a Columbine here’:

    From special needs teacher James Nowak who had a metal stapler thrown at him by Hainstock.

    During testimony Monday afternoon in a Baraboo courtroom, teacher James Nowak recounted his own rising sense of tension with Hainstock, beginning with an incident on Sept, 14. That day, he said, Hainstock threw a metal stapler at him, narrowly missing his head and chipping the wall. When he returned to the classroom with Klang and Buildings and Grounds Director Phillip Rachuj, they found Hainstock holding a chair.

    “He had a chair above his head and he looked like he was going to swing it at us,” said Nowak.

    Rachuj was able to take the chair from Hainstock, and he was suspended from school for three days.

    Apparently, someone fashions himself as Stone Cold Steve Austin. Well, Trench 3:16 says your ass is going to prison.

    From Angela Young, the guidance counselor at Weston Schools…

    She said Hainstock was a boy who sought attention, enjoyed playing the victim and often placed blame for his actions on others. Young said he was often teased by other students, but he picked on them in return.

    Young testified that she was in the hall when Hainstock walked into the school but said she could not see him because of the decorations. She testified she heard Hainstock say “I’m going to (expletive) kill somebody.”

    You can’t play the bullying card when you’re a bully yourself. Then again this whole incident was never about bullying. It’s about a selfish and self-absorbed punk kid who wanted to exact his revenge on a man who cared enough to actually discipline Hainstock.

  • Students testify against Hainstock

    Students Say Hainstock Also Picked On Others:

    Today students from Weston High School testified about the bullying allegations in the trial of Eric Hainstock.

    17-year-old Samuel Brandt testified that he saw Hainstock get in pushing and shoving matches with other kids in the halls, that he often tormented younger students and tried to pick on older kids, who in turn picked on him.

    18-year-old Kimberly Durst says others may have dished it out to Hainstock, but “he dished out right back.”

    So basically he was a belligerent punk.

    Another student testified on Saturday that Hainstock was asking about Columbine the day before the shooting.

    Caitlyn Goldben, a freshman at Weston Schools last year, testified Saturday that Hainstock joined a conversation she had with a friend about a report on Columbine on Sept. 28. Hainstock is accused of murdering Principal John Klang the next morning.

    Goldben said Hainstock asked what Columbine was. After he was told that students Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris killed 12 students and a teacher and wounded 23 others at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colo., in 1999, he replied, “Oh.”

    Goldben said she was friends with Hainstock. Twice he asked her to homecoming, but she turned him down both times.

    It was she who told Klang that Hainstock had the tobacco, she testified. During gym class on the day before the shooting, Hainstock approached her and pointed his finger at her like a gun, accusing her of snitching on him, she testified.

    She said she feared him so she denied telling Klang. He then began complaining about Nowak again.

    “He said he would throw a stapler at him again or shove marijuana down his throat,” she said.

    Then he got into the Columbine discussion, she said.

    “Eric said, Oh.’ Then he got quiet for a little bit and started talking about Mr. Nowak again,” Goldben said.

    Goldben said she told teachers about the conversation, but the district attorney didn’t press her for details.

    One of Hainstock’s attorneys, Jon Helland, tried to defuse the testimony by asking Goldben if Hainstock had said Klebold and Harris were “stupid.” Goldben said Hainstock said no such thing.

    So he became an insta-mutant. Just add firearms.

  • Hainstock said he’d kill

    Witness: Armed Wis. Teen Said He’d Kill:

    Two members of the staff of Weston Schools testified that Eric Hainstock declared his intention to kill before shooting Principal John Klang.

    Custodian Dave Thompson testified he was talking with assistant football coach and social studies teacher Chuck Keller before school when they saw Hainstock walking across the parking lot with a shotgun raised.

    Thompson said the teacher asked the 15-year-old freshman what he was doing with a gun in school and Hainstock replied, ‘”I’m here to (expletive) kill somebody.” ‘ He then pointed the gun barrel to within inches of Keller’s face.

    Thompson ripped the gun away from him, telling him, “No, not in my school,” he recalled. Hainstock then reached into his pocket, Thompson said.

    Fearing the boy had another gun, Thompson ran outside with the shotgun, telling Keller to run.

    After Thompson had taken the shotgun, Keller said that he tried to corner Hainstock in the entryway, but that the boy reached into his pocket and pulled out a .22 revolver.

    Notice that Hainstock didn’t say that he was there to (expletive) scare someone.

    Keller also testified about the character of Hainstock…

    Keller testified he had Hainstock in class a year earlier. The boy was disruptive, touching other students and heckling him during his lectures, Keller said.

    Hainstock was equal parts victim and instigator, he said, but the shenanigans didn’t seem serious.

    If the kid was a loudmouth and an attention seeker he probably brought any alleged bullying on himself. But again none of his alleged abusers were his target, only John Klang was.

  • Parks family sues Zarates

    Parents of murdered Randolph teen sue:

    It’s been a while since we’ve talked about the murder of Jennifer Parks so I’ll do a brief recap for those of you who are new.

    Jennifer Parks was a 16-year-old girl from Randolph, New Jersey. She was killed by her neighbor Jonathan Zarate. Zarate dismembered her body and stuffed her into a steamer trunk. He then hid her body in his parents’ Jeep for 24 hours while he attended a child’s birthday party. Zarate, his brother James, and a third teen were caught trying to dump Jennifer’s body into the Passaic River.

    That was 2 years ago. In true New Jersey fashion, the trial has yet to commence.

    Now the parents of Jennifer Parks are suing the parents of Jonathan Zarate for negligence.

    An attorney for David and Laurie Parks filed the lawsuit in Superior Court in Morristown, claiming Jonathan and James Zarate were negligent in not stopping the other from committing the brutal murder in their father’s home.

    The lawsuit claims the boys’ parents, John Zarate and Flora Mari, failed to adequately supervise them, knowing they both had bullied 16-year-old Jennifer prior to the July 30, 2005 murder.

    Like I always say in these kinds of lawsuits whatever the Parks get it won’t even be close to what they’ve lost with the death of their daughter.

  • Opening day of Hainstock trial

    Opening Statements in Principal Shooting:

    Today was the opening day in the trial of Eric Hainstock. He’s accused in the shooting death of Weston Schools principal John Klang.

    The defense is trying the argument that Hainstock only meant to scare John Klang.

    Hainstock’s attorney, Rhoda Ricciardi, told jurors they should not convict him of first-degree murder because his actions were not intentional, but reckless. She said he told police he only meant to scare people.

    She said Hainstock was upset with kids calling him a “fag.” Ricciardi said his stepbrother sexually abused him when Hainstock was 6, and that his father abused him and refused to give him medication for attention deficit disorder.

    This is the first I’ve heard of claims of sexual abuse but again Hainstock did not strike back at the people who allegedly abused him. He shot and killed someone who was actually trying to help him.

    The prosecution remains unfazed…

    District Attorney Pat Barrett maintained that Hainstock’s anger toward Klang had been building for two weeks before homecoming.

    She noted Klang kicked Hainstock out of school for three days after Hainstock threw a stapler at his special education teacher. Klang also gave Hainstock an in-school suspension after Klang found chewing tobacco in the boy’s backpack.

    Pointing her finger at jurors like a pistol, Barrett also pledged they would hear statements Hainstock gave to investigators in which he said he pulled the trigger on Klang on purpose and testimony from a school janitor who heard Hainstock say he was at the school to kill someone.

    Barrett also said Hainstock brought 50 cartridges for the revolver to school.

    Do 50 rounds of ammunition sound like he was just trying to scare someone? Let’s not forget that Hainstock also brought a shotgun to the school as well even though the shotgun was taken away by a school custodian. Fear was not Hainstock’s objective. Death was.

    Librarian: Hainstock seemed “proud” of violent incident weeks before shooting:
    Librarian Kay Amborn testified today that Eric Hainstock took pride in his throwing a metal stapler at special needs teacher James Nowak.

    Librarian Kay Amborn testified Friday that Hainstock, 16, seemed “proud” a week later on Sept. 21 when he saw a story about the incident published in the Reedsburg Independent, showed it to several other students and asked Amborn to make a copy of it for him. She declined.

    “He said he wanted a copy for his dad, because his dad didn’t get the newspaper,” Amborn testified.

    The stapler incident is what led to Hainstock being suspended by Klang which is what prosecutors believe that led to Hainstock shooting Klang. I tend to agree.

  • Schorling’s appeal denied

    Romeo: Knife attacker loses his appeal:

    Eric Schorling is the stab-happy Michigan teen who plunged a rather large knife into his ex-girlfriend’s back…at school…in front of witnesses…then bragged about it. Luckily the victim survived and Schorling was convicted.

    Now he’s lost the appeal of his conviction.

    He had appealed the case on the grounds that his Circuit Court attorney was able to introduce evidence that Eric Schorling was bullied and he lacked the mental capacity to form specific intent.

    His bullying is that he was called a Nazi because of his swastika tattoo. I think he brought that on himself. Plus I find it comical that the defense attorney claims that he lacked the mental capacity to form specific intent but had enough mental capacity to escape from a detention center before his trial.

    Schorling is currently serving a 10-15 year sentence.

  • Shefelbine’s father has charges increased

    Shefelbine Charge Changed:

    David Shefelbine, the father of alleged serial predator Scott Shefelbine, had his charges increased for assaulting a Connecticut news reporter.

    During his brief arraignment Tuesday in the same court in Rockville, David Shefelbine said nothing as Assistant State’s Attorney Elizabeth C. Leaming increased the charge he faces to third-degree assault. Lori Beth Leavitt, Shefelbine’s attorney, entered a routine not guilty plea and a request for a jury trial.

    Shefelbine the elder is accused of punching reporter Erin Cox after she asked him to comment on his son’s bail being revoked.

    Maybe father and son will have adjoining cells.

  • West Memphis 3 victim’s mother speaks on new DNA evidence

    West Memphis 3: Mom speaks out on new evidence found at crime scene:

    Pam Hobbs, the mother of West Memphis 3 victim Stevie Branch and ex-husband to Terry Hobbs, is saying that it is possible that Terry Hobbs could have committed the murders of the three boys.

    “I would say there is a possibility that he could be capable. I hate to say it because I’m going on my thoughts and feelings,” she added.

    Pam Hobbs said she remembers discovering 14 knives owned by her then husband Terry Hobbs.

    “A bunch of knives, a few of them I was aware of but there was quite a few I wasn’t aware of. And Stevie’s knife being in that collection, that really put up a warning sign. What are you doing with Stevie’s knife, it would have been with him,” Pam Hobbs explained.

    Hobbs said Steve’s grandfather gave him the knife. She also said she turned them over to police when she found them.

    Pam Hobbs turned those knives over to defense attorneys in 2002 when she was separating from Terry Hobbs. Terry Hobbs claims that he is innocent and that Pam Hobbs is doing this out of spite.

    Terry Hobbs dismissed the knives as having had “nothing to do with anything.”

    “I’d bought some, and found some and Pam bought me some. I just threw them in a drawer, and that’s where they’d been for years.” He added, “Them knives were stolen out of my home and I’m fixing to try to get them back.”

    Asked whether one of the knives was a pocket knife given to Stevie by his grandfather, Terry Hobbs responded: “I don’t know. It could have been. And it could have been it was in the drawer because we didn’t want him to have it. I didn’t want a kid of mine to go around with a pocket knife — not a kid who was 8 years old. Would you?”

    Terry Hobbs said, “I raised Stevie from the time he was a year and a half, until he was 8. I tried to be a good daddy.”

    As for his ex-wife, he said, “Pam’s got some problems. This thing has taken a toll on her. It’s really hurt her.

    “I don’t think she really supports the idea they [the convicted men] are innocent. I think she’s doing it out of anger. As a matter of fact, I know it’s out of anger. It’s being angry at the world and not knowing how to deal with her anger.

    “It’s kind of sad. And I’m really sorry that people think she supports that theory.”

    Terry Hobbs has said previously that the hair sample that was recovered from the scene could have come from anywhere since all three boys were friends and frequently visited the Hobbs’ household.

    I wonder if the WM3 zealots will now focus their vitriol at Terry Hobbs instead of Mark Byers now.