Author: Trench Reynolds

  • Video Game Violence 2005

    Video Game Violence 2005

    Violent game furor:

    Here we go again, folks. Last year, it was GTA: San Andreas. This year it’s a new game made by Eidos called “25 to Life”. This is the first I’ve heard about this game, so let me quote the article…

    “25 to Life,” allows players to attack police with an arsenal of Molotov cocktails, broken bottles and baseball bats. When weapons fail, players make strategic moves using civilians as human shields.

    The game even lets players choose gang colors and create personalized graffiti tags.

    It sounds like a GTA rip off to me. I bet the gameplay will suck. But of course, that’s not the point here. Certain lawmakers have their panties in a wad…

    “It’s the worst in a series of violent and gruesome games that lower the common denominator of decency,” said Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who is trying to block the game from hitting stores in September.

    “25 to Life” makes “other controversial games like ‘Grand Theft Auto’ look like ‘Romper Room,’” Schumer said.

    Schumer called on PlayStation manufacturer Sony and Xbox maker Microsoft to cancel their licensing agreements with Eidos. The senator also urged stores and retailers not to stock the game.

    Patrick Lynch, president of the Patrolman’s Benevolent Association, slammed “25 to Life” for its cavalier treatment of murder.

    “It’s outrageous that a company like this would try to desensitize our children,” Lynch said.

    First off, have you noticed that when a politician is usually involved in calling for the censoring of a video game, it’s usually a Democrat?

    Secondly, these are obviously people who have never held a game controller in their life, or at least not since Space Invaders or the Atari 2600.

    Not all video games are aimed towards children anymore, and haven’t been since the dawn of Mortal Kombat back in the early ’90s.

    Lastly, the bigger a deal you make out of these games, the more hype you’re giving them. You’re taking what looks like to be a mediocre game at best, and you’re potentially making it a blockbuster by trying to censor it. People always want what they can’t have.

    If this game ends up in the hands of children, it’s because of irresponsible parents, and I have yet to hear any kind of blame falling on them. Remember kids, censorship is the solution to bad parenting. Or so says the Democrats.

  • Osantowski Verdict Aftermath

    Osantowski Verdict Aftermath

    Michigan teen guilty of making threats to attack school:

    (Log in info) Andrew Osantowski’s defense attorney, Brian Legghio, continues to crack me up…

    Defense attorney Brian Legghio said he plans to file an appeal after the sentencing arguing, among other things, the cache of weapons discovered in Osantowski’s home should have not been admissible as evidence. Prosecutors did not have to prove Osantowski had the capability or the intent to carry out a threat, he said, and called that evidence prejudicial.

    “When you peel that away, all you’re left with is a text message,” said Legghio, who doubted the message alone would have been enough to get a conviction.

    He added that he would “bet my bar card” that the conviction would be overturned on appeal.

    I would love to take that bet. Osantowski pleaded guilty to the stolen weapons charge, so why shouldn’t it have been presented as evidence? Why is it prejudicial if it’s fact?

    What is also very interesting is this quote from Chippewa Valley Superintendent Mark Deldin…

    “There probably would have been some fear in our community if he had gone back home, in our neighborhoods,” Deldin said. “But I think the biggest message that this verdict sends today goes beyond Chippewa Valley Schools. It’s a resounding message that threats of violence and terrorism in our schools will not be tolerated.”

    Emphasis mine.

    That’s a great point. This case should have gotten more media attention than it did. This case should serve as a warning to those who would entertain the thought of attacking their school that this is their fate. I hope the sentencing phase drives home that point as well.

  • Osantowski found guilty

    Osantowski found guilty

    Macomb County teen found guilty of threatening terrorism:

    A jury found Andrew Osantowski guilty of threatening an act of terrorism and using a computer to threaten terrorism. Each charge is punishable by up to 20 years in prison. Sentencing is set to take place on July 11.

  • Arrogance

    Arrogance

    Trial ends for terror suspect:

    This is another article about the Andrew Osantowski trial. It doesn’t provide much more information than already given, but a couple of the paragraphs regarding Andrew Osantowski’s attorney, Brian Legghio, made my jaw drop…

    Legghio, however, voiced some doubt about the authenticity or completeness of McGinty’s record of the chats as submitted to her father; he also likened himself to fictional Atticus Finch for defending a marginal and unpopular client and compared his client to Japanese Americans during World War II or blacks in the old South.

    Legghio said the teen was misguided or a geek, who probably needs therapy. He said Osantowski did not show any intent to coerce civilians or the government.

    “That’s the most important element,” Legghio told the jury in closings. “Otherwise, by God you can just forget your free speech, because you aren’t going to have any left.”

    Emphasis mine.

    Could this guy be any more arrogant? And here I thought doctors were the only ones with God complexes. I guess criminal defense attorneys do too.

  • Osantowski Trial Concludes

    Osantowski Trial Concludes

    Jury weighs terror, firearm charges against teen:

    I guess I watch too much Law & Order. I was expecting a longer trial. The trial for Andrew Osantowski on terror charges ended yesterday, and the jury will deliberate on his fate today. I guess that’s what they mean by your right to a speedy trial. However, the way juries have been acting lately, I’m not getting my hopes up on a conviction.

  • Osantowski claims bullying. I claim bullshit

    Osantowski claims bullying. I claim bullshit

    Teen accused of plotting massacre at high school said he was bullied:

    According to this Associated Press article Andrew Osantowski claims he was bullied in his IM chat with Celia McGinty. In the partial chat transcript that’s been released the only thing he says about bullying is…

    nazi_bot_sadistic:(expletive) bullied…made fun of….pushed….people can get away with murder

    So I call bullshit on the Associated Press. Not to mention the fact that Andrew Osantowski attended Chippewa Valley High School for 10 days before he was arrested. How can you have so much hatred for a school in such a small amount of time? I doubt he got the idea to shoot up a school in just 10 days. This is more telling as why he wanted to shoot up a school…

    “I’m going to bring nightmares back to everyone, roam the land as a ghost still killing people,” Osantowski wrote. “I’ll have followers. I’ll be famous too.”

    Just another mutant.

    Celia McGinty was supposed to have testified today against Osantowski but…

    “She really doesn’t want to see (Osantowski) face-to-face,” assistant Macomb County prosecutor Steve Kaplan said.

    Can you blame her?

    Her father, Sgt. George McGinty, a Washington State University policeman, did testify saying that…

    …his daughter left a printout of Osantowski’s messages with him while he was sleeping. He said he took it to work, read it and asked co-workers to follow-up with Michigan authorities.

  • Opening Statements in Osantowski Trial

    Opening Statements in Osantowski Trial

    Lawyer: No criminal act by teen accused of threatening terrorism:

    The opening statements in Andrew Osantowski’s trial were today.

    First up, defense attorney turned comedian Brian Legghio…

    The lawyer for a 17-year-old accused of plotting a massacre at his suburban Detroit high school said Friday that the teenager is angry, hurt and foolish, but isn’t guilty of threatening an act of terrorism.

    “He might belong in therapy. He might need psychotropic drugs. But what he did when he communicated with this girl was not a criminal act,” defense attorney Brian Legghio said during his opening statement at Andrew Osantowski’s trial.

    That’s the best you’ve got? Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, my client is a psychotic nut job in possession of stolen firearms, but in no way did he threaten to blow up that school. Um..yeah…sure.

    Next up, assistant county prosecutor Steve Kaplan…

    But assistant county prosecutor Steve Kaplan told the 14 jurors that Internet messages sent by Osantowski violated state laws against threatening an act of terrorism and using a computer to make threats of terrorism.

    “This is not a crime of terrorism. The crime is making a threat of terrorism, not committing terrorism,” Kaplan said. “The facts really are not in dispute.”

    It’s hard to argue with that.

    Celia McGinty, the Idaho girl who reported the threats made in a chat with Osantowski, is expected to testify on Monday.

  • Osantowski Pleads Guilty to Firearms Charges

    Osantowski Pleads Guilty to Firearms Charges

    Teen accused of planning an attack pleads guilty to firearms charges:

    Andrew Osantowski pleaded guilty to three counts of receiving and concealing firearms. And again my favorite lawyer turned comedian, Brian Legghio had some funny things to say…

    Legghio said Thursday’s guilty pleas do not prove Osantowski planned to use the guns, an AK-47 assault rifle and two pump shotguns stolen from a local firearms dealer. He also said the terrorism law under which his client is being prosecuted may violate free speech rights.

    “Can you criminalize speech just because you don’t like what somebody says?” Legghio said.

    No, but when someone says they’re going to kill their family, then shoot up the school, it’s no longer free speech. Especially since that person was found with an AK-47 assault rifle and two pump shotguns. And yeah, he didn’t plan to use the stolen guns. He was going to give them back your honor, honest. Whatever.

    My favorite part is that Legghio motioned to get the chat transcripts amended to say “Andrew” instead of Osantowski’s username “nazi_bot_sadistic”. The judge rejected that motion. Go figure.

    The prosecution doesn’t seem to be fazed by the guilty plea…

    Kaplan said his case was helped by Osantowski’s admission that he knowingly possessed stolen firearms. “If he tries to commit an act of terrorism, he needs something more than a slingshot,” the prosecutor said during jury selection.

    And as far as sentencing goes…

    The felony firearm charge carries a 2-year mandatory sentence. Each firearm charge to which Osantowski pleaded guilty is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison, but Switalski said he would not set a sentencing date until after the remainder of the case was tried.

    More on this as it develops.

  • Osantowski Confession Ruled Inadmissible

    Osantowski Confession Ruled Inadmissible

    Taped theft confession by teen is ruled inadmissible:

    As I mentioned yesterday, the taped confession of Andrew Osantowski admitting he broke into a gun shop could possibly be thrown out. Macomb County Circuit Judge Matthew Switalski ruled that the tape was, in fact, inadmissible…

    But Macomb County Circuit Judge Matthew Switalski ruled that Osantowski’s admission to stealing several weapons from a Clinton Township gun shop is inadmissible because he made the statements only after he was promised leniency if he cooperated with the investigation.

    But all is not lost…

    Prosecutors will still be able to use some of the Sept. 16 interview, in which 17-year-old Andrew Osantowski admitted to writing messages in online chat rooms that police believe were threats to kill a police officer, family members and his three cats.

    And like I said yesterday, Andrew Osantowski documented a lot of his criminal activity online. I think there is more than enough evidence to convict. But that’s just my opinion.

  • Some good news for once

    Some good news for once

    Student Injured in Red Lake Shooting Leaves Hospital:

    Some good news out of Red Lake for once. Jeffrey May was allowed to leave the hospital today. May suffered a stroke after being shot by Jeff Weise while May was trying to defend two other students. Unfortunately, his mother Jodi is still in guarded condition after suffering a stroke believed to have been brought about by the stress of the situation. My thoughts and prayers are still with the May family at this time.