Media slammed by Facebook

Facebook slaps media: Angry at use of massacre victims’ postings:

It seems that Facebook is pissed, and rightly so, at the media for taking the pictures of the Virginia Tech victims that were posted on their Facebooks and using them for their stories.

“We absolutely do not support how the media has been using Facebook in many cases,” Brandee Barker, a Facebook spokeswoman told the Herald. “We see this as a violation of user privacy.”

Facebook is objecting to the use of quotes and information taken from user profiles. “That user should give the permission to any media organization for that information to be used,” Barker said.

From the New York Daily News and The New York Times [NYT] to The Washington Post and the Herald, newspapers, along with broadcast outlets across the country, are publishing material from Facebook profiles and tributes.

The Washington Post published a full chronicle of mournful posts that Virginia Tech students posted on Facebook this week.

Barker also took issue with the way reporters sending out mass messages over Facebook to solicit interviews.Several Facebook users have complained about getting messages from journalists, she said.

NBC news program “Dateline” went so far as to create a Facebook profile seeking out possible friends of the shooter Cho Seung-Hui.

Facebook shut down Dateline’s page and has deactivated a few reporters accounts, Barker said. “My main recommendation in general is that the press act responsibly around this,” she said. “They’re being insensitive and in some cases very unprofessional.”

Nothing is quite as disgusting as the media vultures in a feeding frenzy.

Comments

3 responses to “Media slammed by Facebook”

  1. paulo Avatar

    If you post something publicly on the internet, it’s, um, well, it’s public. That’s the opposite of private. I can’t see how it’s a violation of privacy in any way. I read this blog because I think it’s absolutely hysterical when people post evidence of criminal activity and then get caught because of their own stupidity. Is it only a violation of privacy when it’s bad guys posting things on the internets? Is it not a violation of privacy when you link to a criminal’s MySpace profile?

  2. Jessica Avatar
    Jessica

    I have to agree with you…if they did not want their stuff published, they should have never posted it in the first place. The whole point of people putting up their information is for others to read and learn more about them. If they don’t want others to know about them, don’t post.

  3. CB Avatar
    CB

    I actually agree as well. I love reading about how these dumb ass people post their crimes online like they AREN’T going to get caught or something. On the other side, even good people shouldn’t post anything online that they don’t want people to see. Like the thousands of underage people on Facebook and MySpace who post pictures of themselves drinking alcohol. Can’t they get in trouble for that? All you have to do is check their birth date, see that they still aren’t 21 and you got them for underage drinking… right?

    However, I still don’t think that the media should be so insensitive to the kids’ feelings. But what can you do, that’s journalism…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *