Boy, 13, is arrested amid fears:
This is a follow up to yesterday’s story about the 13-year-old Annapolis boy who was arrested for trying to recruit people for a Columbine style attack against St. Martin’s Lutheran School.
No specific motive has yet been released except…
But according to a police news release, the boy “was attempting to get other pupils to join him in ‘re-creating Columbine,’” and he “repeatedly made statements indicating that he had the desire to harm people at the school and get back at them for perceived wrongs against him.”
I’m curious to know what those “perceived wrongs against him” are.
Anyway, my main bone of contention with this article is the fact that they interviewed someone from the ACLU (AssCLowns Unlimted)…
David Rocah, staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union of Maryland, had a mixed reaction.
“It is right for the principal to be concerned, call the police and for the police to investigate,” Rocah said. “This is not the same thing as saying that a crime has been committed and the police can arrest someone in the middle of the night.”
Rocah said Maryland’s courts have found that the statute pertaining to disrupting school activities “is only violated when there is a significant violation or interference with the administration or classes at the school — and nothing that the police have said indicated that has occurred here.”
He added: “Having violent thoughts is not a crime, and we don’t have thought police in the U.S.”
Sometimes I can’t believe some of the stuff that the ACLU spouts. Just because his actions were not violent yet doesn’t necessarily make them legal. At what point would he have had to be along in his plan before the ACLU would say that the actions taken by are ok? When they’re putting sheets over top bloody bodies of the victims? Then again what do you expect from an organization that defends traitors, cop killers, and pedophiles?
Sphere: Related Content
Entries (RSS)